|
It is the DataNucleus projects' committed aim to provide the best performance possible, and to
publish benchmarks so that users can judge for themselves the performance of the persistence solution.
If anybody has a publically available benchmark of Java object persistence that they want to compare
DataNucleus on, we would be interested in contributing to the exercise so we can see how DataNucleus
performs.
Our attitude is that :-
-
Public benchmarks are there for a reason and provide valuable information for our users.
-
We will publish valid public benchmarks no matter if they show DataNucleus is deficient in some
area. Published benchmarks will show, wherever possible, all competing products so that you,
the user, can see how DataNucleus compares. Benchmarks are comparative so you have to have other
products to compare against. This is in stark contrast to competing persistence technologies which
do not publish benchmarks maybe in the fear that it may make them look bad.
-
If DataNucleus is found lacking in performance in a particular area, we will strive to remedy
the problem so that you always have a competitive product.
-
If any group wishes to make a comparison of DataNucleus with other persistence solutions we are
willing to aid them in finding an optimum DataNucleus configuration.
For performance of DataNucleus Access Platform, please refer to the
Performance Tuning Guide
|
|
