Issue Details (XML | Word | Printable)

Key: NUCCORE-434
Type: Bug Bug
Status: Closed Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: Major Major
Assignee: Andy Jefferson
Reporter: Andy Jefferson
Votes: 0
Watchers: 0
Operations

If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
DataNucleus Core

Interface field persisted as serializable shouldn't have to have a persistent implementation

Created: 24/Dec/09 03:04 PM   Updated: 17/Mar/10 08:54 PM   Resolved: 24/Dec/09 03:17 PM
Component/s: Java Types
Affects Version/s: 1.1.0.release, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5, 1.1.6, 2.0.0.m1, 2.0.0.m2, 2.0.0.m3, 2.0.0.m4
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0.release


 Description  « Hide
If we have a field declared as

@Persistent
@Serialized
MyInterface intf;

and intf has no persistent implementation then we get an exception from AbstractMemberMetaData.setRelation about not having interface types defined. Should not need to specify that if serialising the field

Sort Order: Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Andy Jefferson added a comment - 24/Dec/09 03:17 PM
SVN trunk fixes this