DataNucleus JIRA is now in read-only mode. Raise any new issues in GitHub against the plugin that it applies to. DataNucleus JIRA will remain for the foreseeable future but will eventually be discontinued
Issue Details (XML | Word | Printable)

Key: NUCCORE-434
Type: Bug Bug
Status: Closed Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: Major Major
Assignee: Andy Jefferson
Reporter: Andy Jefferson
Votes: 0
Watchers: 0

If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
DataNucleus Core

Interface field persisted as serializable shouldn't have to have a persistent implementation

Created: 24/Dec/09 03:04 PM   Updated: 17/Mar/10 08:54 PM   Resolved: 24/Dec/09 03:17 PM
Component/s: Java Types
Affects Version/s: 1.1.0.release, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5, 1.1.6, 2.0.0.m1, 2.0.0.m2, 2.0.0.m3, 2.0.0.m4
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0.release

 Description  « Hide
If we have a field declared as

MyInterface intf;

and intf has no persistent implementation then we get an exception from AbstractMemberMetaData.setRelation about not having interface types defined. Should not need to specify that if serialising the field

Andy Jefferson added a comment - 24/Dec/09 03:17 PM
SVN trunk fixes this

Andy Jefferson made changes - 24/Dec/09 03:17 PM
Field Original Value New Value
Status Open [ 1 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
Andy Jefferson made changes - 17/Mar/10 08:54 PM
Status Resolved [ 5 ] Closed [ 6 ]