Issue Details (XML | Word | Printable)

Key: NUCRDBMS-469
Type: Improvement Improvement
Status: Closed Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: Major Major
Assignee: Unassigned
Reporter: Andy Jefferson
Votes: 0
Watchers: 1
Operations

If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
DataNucleus Store RDBMS

Consider merging store.rdbms.connectionpool into store.rdbms plugin

Created: 15/Nov/10 05:32 PM   Updated: 10/Dec/10 07:49 AM   Resolved: 20/Nov/10 09:04 AM
Component/s: Connection
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.2.0.release


 Description  « Hide
Whilst it is nice to have modularity, how many users should be using DN RDBMS without a connection pool? Since we support all major third party solutions now, and the number of classes is small, we ought to consider merging the connectionpool plugin into the RDBMS plugin to reduce the number of plugins by one, and then the user only needs to have the third party jars in their class path.

On a related topic it may be nice to bundle one of the third party solutions (repackaged) in the RDBMS plugin too, so that way we have a good fallback for when they don't specify one (e.g Proxool, since it is Apache licensed, although it does require commons-logging!)

Sort Order: Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Andy Jefferson added a comment - 20/Nov/10 09:04 AM
SVN trunk now includes the "connection-pool" adapters